POLL: Over at CCMB, "True fans" say they want to be relegated. What about you?

Rebrand issue divides fans, but how divided are we? Over at CCMB it's obvious that they are no plastics, currently 72% would rather get relegated than to continue in red with Tan.

What about you guys?

edit: here's the link: http://www.ccmb.co.uk/fudforum/index.php?t=msg&th=383769

None of these, I don't think Malky back at Cardiff in the Championship would get promoted without money

What about an option 'Support Cardiff City through thick and thin' because that's what this forum is about.
I couldn't give an answer to any of those questions because none of them apply to me.

well said CS

Cyncoedslumdog wrote:What about an option 'Support Cardiff City through thick and thin' because that's what this forum is about.
I couldn't give an answer to any of those questions because none of them apply to me.

This is what all true fans should support.

Regarding the 72% we must remember they still only represent a small minority of fans who go week in week out, the majority of whom don't even bother with the forums and if they did I am sure most would join us here rather than read the drivel spouted on the others.

  

Cyncoedslumdog wrote:What about an option 'Support Cardiff City through thick and thin' because that's what this forum is about.
I couldn't give an answer to any of those questions because none of them apply to me.

Yeah, I'm with you on this one, for sure. But like JamesWales wrote in that thread at CCMB:

JamesWales at CCMB wrote:The crux of the point is that a new logo and colours, coupled with an owner who really does show a huge disregard for our history and identity does make it feel to many as if this isn't our club anymore, and when that happens you naturally have less passion, less intense feeling behind it etc.

You can understand them, right?

But what is so frustrating is that most of (?) the 72%-ers at CCMB, they cannot for the life of them understand how their action affects the team adversely. They don't accept that a supporting fanbase can win us points or that booing a player or the team can cost us points. Not only that, but this poll makes it clear they do not care.

Actually no I can't understand them.
I've been watching City for far longer than most of them and to me it's still Cardiff City with an unchanged history and heritage. In that time, owners have come and gone - mostly with little feeling for the Club and even less money. At least Tan has put his money where his mouth is.
During that time, I've never felt it was MY club - it's a football team I support with my mates. I also have a life which stops me whining constantly about the colour of a shirt. Perhaps a lot of our so called supporters should simply support the Club rather than pursue their own agendas.

Cyncoedslumdog wrote:What about an option 'Support Cardiff City through thick and thin' because that's what this forum is about.
I couldn't give an answer to any of those questions because none of them apply to me.

    

i wear my red team shirt with pride because it represents the club colours, if i am still around and if the club changes its colours to whatever i will adjust my wardrope accordingly

I think asking the question here is somewhat irrelevant, we all chose red when we first decided to sign up here. If Tan offered blue back id take it in a heartbeat, but there are half a million things more important than a shirt colour right now.

Agree with that Red.

Red614 wrote:I think asking the question here is somewhat irrelevant, we all chose red when we first decided to sign up here. If Tan offered blue back id take it in a heartbeat, but there are half a million things more important than a shirt colour right now.

  

Scarf-gate at the Brighton game last year showed just how little these poles matter. Something like 98% of people said they'd refuse to accept the scarf... arrive at the ground to a stadium covered in 90% red.

Wait? There was a rebrand? When the hell did this happen??

Arkay Dubya wrote:Wait? There was a rebrand? When the hell did this happen??

  

I have just had a quick look at the original thread over on CCMB to which there were 55 replies and 133 votes cast from 2437 hits.

Obviously there are guests and repeat visitors taking part in the thread, but it seems to me that 133 bothering to vote from more than 2000 visiting simply highlights the general lack of interest there is in this subject.

Given that the vast majority of City supporters do not visit the messageboards in any event, but those that do tend to be more anti-Tan than pro-Tan, this is a pretty good demonstration of the lack of support that the anti-Tan lobby really has.

65% of 133 is 86 individuals........hardly enough to form a cold compress let alone a pressure group..........