NEIL WARNOCK SHOULD OF BEEN BACKED

This from someone who wants Tan out and crucified him over the Clubs debts, yet now says he should have given Warnock funds to buy more players.
He really is an ar****le.
He can't even use the correct grammar in his posts.

It's his heading on the dark side, not mine.

I'm not interested what goes on on that board.

I am sure that Warnock could have brought in the players if he felt that they might be a difference.  It is clear that we are not going to be relegated with the present squad, but there is little chance of making up sufficient ground on the play off teams.

Far better to nurture the shoots of growth we have seen in the squad we have and see how far up the table we can progress.  I am sure that the manager will be backed in the summer, if he wants to stay on.

TDA wrote:I'm not interested what goes on on that board.

I am sure that Warnock could have brought in the players if he felt that they might be a difference.  It is clear that we are not going to be relegated with the present squad, but there is little chance of making up sufficient ground on the play off teams.

Far better to nurture the shoots of growth we have seen in the squad we have and see how far up the table we can progress.  I am sure that the manager will be backed in the summer, if he wants to stay on.

I look on there purely to see how much c**p is put out by AA and his multiple accounts.
He really does still believe he is the messiah to his handful of followers.

: