Your move Brendan Rodgers...

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Tyrion Tannister
Tyrion Tannister
Global Superstar
Global Superstar
Posts : 5652
User Points : 18418
Posting Flair : 1090
Join date : 2012-06-26

PostTyrion Tannister Sat Feb 02, 2013 6:18 am

In virtually a mirror incident to our own former player's, Liverpools Raheem Sterling has been charged with assault against a woman who suffered facial injuries. Think Sterling will also find his way out the door?

Bearing in mind, Brendan Rodgers is a man that has allowed Suarez to dive, play act and hurl abuse at referees every match he plays and only punish him when he tells the press. In pretty certain he'll ignore the fact he's playing a wifebeater if he starts giving liverpool wins.
thewelshfella
thewelshfella
Club Legend
Club Legend
Posts : 1562
User Points : 7013
Posting Flair : 200
Join date : 2012-07-12
Age : 40
Location : pontypridd

Postthewelshfella Sat Feb 02, 2013 6:55 am

I would be happy for Raheem Sterling to play for us even if he had been charged for animal molestation Popcorn

But obviously im against such acts Your move Brendan Rodgers... 635981802 ]Your move Brendan Rodgers... Getsmiley

Your move Brendan Rodgers... Sheep
TDA
TDA
Global Superstar
Global Superstar
Posts : 8228
User Points : 26030
Posting Flair : 1850
Join date : 2012-07-06

PostTDA Sat Feb 02, 2013 6:59 am

I was wondering the same.

Unfortunately, in football, there is a world of difference between a transgression of an untried youth player and that of an established Premiership player.

The offence might be the same, but the gesture of dismissal would be far more costly in terms of £££££ for a club in the latter instance and that what counts.........sad times indeed!
Arkay Dubya
Arkay Dubya
Global Superstar
Global Superstar
Posts : 8996
User Points : 28232
Posting Flair : 1906
Join date : 2012-06-15
Age : 104
Location : Here, there, everywhere
http://westerneyes.smugmug.com/

PostArkay Dubya Sat Feb 02, 2013 7:14 am

I think that would come under "gross misconduct" which - I think - means the employee (Sterling) wouldn't be entitled to a payoff. Any HR experte on here? Your move Brendan Rodgers... 3392635135

I don't think Brenda or any Premier League club has got the balls to sack a high profile/England International player though. They'll spin it somehow and save face.
Rhys
Rhys
Global Superstar
Global Superstar
Posts : 9525
User Points : 35015
Posting Flair : 2229
Join date : 2012-06-12
Age : 39
http://www.redbluebirds.com

PostRhys Sat Feb 02, 2013 9:17 am

Brendon: yes, but did he knock her out?....
TDA
TDA
Global Superstar
Global Superstar
Posts : 8228
User Points : 26030
Posting Flair : 1850
Join date : 2012-07-06

PostTDA Sat Feb 02, 2013 10:49 pm

Arkay v2.0 wrote:I think that would come under "gross misconduct" which - I think - means the employee (Sterling) wouldn't be entitled to a payoff. Any HR experte on here? Your move Brendan Rodgers... 3392635135

I don't think Brenda or any Premier League club has got the balls to sack a high profile/England International player though. They'll spin it somehow and save face.

Sorry, could have been clearer. I wasn't thinking of the cost of getting rid of a contracted player, more so the potential loss of revenue through weakening the team.
Arkay Dubya
Arkay Dubya
Global Superstar
Global Superstar
Posts : 8996
User Points : 28232
Posting Flair : 1906
Join date : 2012-06-15
Age : 104
Location : Here, there, everywhere
http://westerneyes.smugmug.com/

PostArkay Dubya Sat Feb 02, 2013 11:49 pm

Ahhh, yes. I'm with you now.
Slimfrog's Son™
Slimfrog's Son™
Global Superstar
Global Superstar
Posts : 5804
User Points : 21200
Posting Flair : 1110
Join date : 2012-08-17
Age : 40
Location : Monmouthshire

PostSlimfrog's Son™ Sun Feb 03, 2013 6:14 am

Arkay v2.0 wrote:I think that would come under "gross misconduct" which - I think - means the employee (Sterling) wouldn't be entitled to a payoff. Any HR experte on here? Your move Brendan Rodgers... 3392635135

I don't think Brenda or any Premier League club has got the balls to sack a high profile/England International player though. They'll spin it somehow and save face.

If he is charged with the offence Liverpool would not have to pay out. I'm sure it would be within his contract that he couldn't bring the club's name into disrepute, and what he has done would be in breach of this. If found guilty in a court that would ensure the club wouldn't need to conduct much if an internal investigation prior to a contract termination.
Sponsored content

PostSponsored content

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

Create an account or log in to leave a reply

You need to be a member in order to leave a reply.

Create an account

Join our community by creating a new account. It's easy!


Create a new account

Log in

Already have an account? No problem, log in here.


Log in

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum